Elections 2010 - Set or not my own criteria of elections? What should I know?

Leveraging this opportunity to review values, let's talk about the issue at the elections. But not now speak of this subject already saturated by the context of the people as regards the "who's the best candidate," or about 10 million problem "caused or could cause the population to reverse the socio-economic areas. Theissue now is: What real risk we run today in relation to the assessment criteria for choosing candidates? First we go to this definition, the main criteria of choice used by most people in their choice of candidate:1-Honesty;2-Experience;3-Charisma to the people;4-Safety5-Ideas
These are the basic concepts of choice that are generally adopted by the people directly or indirectly. The honesty of an agent, is sometimes questioned by the fact that even necessarily need to meet the commitments of the status of their party and their interests beyond their particular projects, although this will compromise them. This is an indirect analysis, only to illustrate how much work it can mean, for example, administer the budget of a given project without making mistakes in their applications.Regarding experience, for being tied to cycles, it becomes almost impossible to predict accurately how much this will influence a political campaign. Measures that worked four years ago today are already obsolete with today's progress in various areas of culture and market, considering also their difficulties here and there. A great example, we can find in their own economy and its requirements, has never been so necessary partnership between the leaders of large corporations to experience the economic difficulties encountered after the recession for their companies, not to lose the power of capital turnover, and in some cases even fail.Hence the importance in choosing a candidate committed to the economy in order to remedy the individual value of the most urgent activities and those related to culture and knowledge. But is that the skills provided by major institutions to bring humanity into the clarity of ideas or induce chaos? ... It will be possible from public agencies the initiative to bring new knowledge to re-establish, for example, care for natural resources maintenance and repair in order to stimulate, not just public officials do, but their own citizens and community leaders? ... always remember that, before the chaos, the need arises, and by necessity, the very momentum generated by concern about their own experience and can induce even qualify to human action never previously considered. But one important exception, that such initiatives are worthless by some candidates, if they do not have a relationship that is close to the people. The favorite candidate, the "beloved," is usually the one with most projects of assistance to families, first of all to mitigate the most serious problems. Not to dwell too much on this issue, it is important to understand that the foundations of a society in the long run, households are sometimes, its limitations, we see this clearly in welfare policies, where the most popular candidate is not what further invest in the growth of a nation, even one that has the most accurate solutions for structuring a city to eliminate its most serious problems of health and employment generation, and yes, those who take advantage of the major hardships that exist in our model, to emphasize them in large campaigns aimed at the failures of the previous government, that although many contests, many of the people themselves contribute to maintain as reality, sometimes with uprisings, sometimes with passivity, but never withsatisfaction.

Bruno Chevrand Prinz 15/08/2010.